Outcomes of childhood severe malaria: a comparative of study pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods.

BACKGROUND: The collateral damages from measures adopted to mitigate the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have been projected to negatively impact malaria in sub-Saharan Africa. Herein, we compare the prevalence and outcomes of childhood severe malaria during the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of cases of severe malaria admitted from 1st January to 31st December 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period) and 1st January to 31st December 2020 (COVID-19 period). We extracted relevant information, including demographics, the duration of symptoms before presentation, forms of severe malaria, and outcomes of hospitalization (discharged or death). RESULTS: In the pre-COVID-19 period, there were a total of 2312 admissions to the EPU and 1685 in the COVID-19 period, representing a decline of 27%. In contrast, there were 263 and 292 severe malaria admissions in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods, respectively, representing an 11% increase in the absolute number of cases. The prevalence rates were 11.4% in the pre-COVID-19 period and 17.3% in the COVID-19 period, representing an increase of 52% in the percentage differences. The mortality rate in the COVID-19 period was higher than the pre-COVID-19 period ([10.3%; 30/292 vs. 2.3%; 6/263], p 0.001). The death rate increased by 350% during the COVID-19 period. The odds ratio (OR) of a child dying from severe malaria in the COVID-19 era was 4.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.008 to 11.982]. In the COVID-19 era, presentation at a health facility was also delayed (p = 0.029), as were the odds of multiple features of severe malaria manifestations (OR-1.9, 95% CI, 1.107 to 3.269; p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the prevalence of severe childhood malaria increased by as much as 11.0%, with a disproportionate increase in mortality compared to the pre-pandemic level. Most children with severe malaria presented late with multiple features of severe malaria, probably contributing to the poor hospitalization outcomes (death) observed in this study.

Trends in Rifampicin Resistance Among Children With Presumptive TB in the Pre-COVID and COVID-Era.

Publications on COVID-19's impact on the global tuberculosis burden are from adult cohorts, pediatric data are lacking for inform decision. We compared the TB trends in southern Nigerian children in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of early morning sputum/gastric washing or stool samples from children with presumptive TB evaluated using GeneXpert in a tertiary hospital from January 2016 to May 2022. Of the 20 589 persons screened for presumed TB in the pre-COVID-19 and the COVID-19 era, only 1104 (88.7%) of 1245 children had complete data for analysis. In the COVID era, a significantly higher number of children were presumed to have TB 755 (68.4%), P < .001. The overall incidence of MTB detected by Xpert MTB/RIF during the study period was 6.4% (71/1104). The incidence of MTB in the pre-COVID-19 era was 24/349 (6.9%), which was slightly higher than the COVID-19 era (47/755; 6.2%), P > .05). The annual trends of MTB detected peaked in 2019 [18/115; 15.7%] in the pre-COVID-19 era, then plummeted to 12/228 (5.3%) in 2020 in the COVID-19 era, and reached its all-time low of 6/160 (3.8%) in the first half of 2022, (P < .001). The overall incidence of Rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) was 2.8% among the MTB detected cases and all occurred in the COVID-19 era. This study found a significant decline in MTB diagnosis and in the emergence of RR-TB in the COVID-19 era. This necessitates re-prioritizing worldwide efforts to manage childhood tuberculosis, including increased testing, if the aim of eliminating tuberculosis by 2035 is to be met.

Trends in rifampicin resistance among patients with presumptive TB in the pre-COVID and COVID-era.

Background: The COVID 19 pandemic has had its impact on tuberculosis notification, incidence, and management, particularly in the context of rifampicin-resistant TB. We set out to determine the trends in rifampicin resistant tuberculosis between the pre-COVID and COVID era in a resource-constrained setting. Methods: This was a retrospective review of single early morning sputum from presumed tuberculosis between January 2016 and May 2022 in a regional TB referral and treatment centre in South-western, Nigeria. We used a molecular beacon to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and mutations in the rpoB gene using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: We analyzed 19,892 of 20,589 presumptive TB with complete data. Most subjects were in the age group 18-45 years (10,594; 53.3 %) and were males (11,492; 57.8 %). Of the 19,892 presumptive TB, 4,526 (22.8 %) were in pre-COVID-19 era (Jan 2016-December 2019) and 15,366 (77.2 %) cases were in COVID-19 era (Jan 2020-May 2022). The MTB notification declined during the COVID-19 era compared with the pre-COVID-19 era (10.5 % vs 12.9 %, p < 0.001). The annual prevalence of MTB rose from 5.6 % (2016) to a peak of 23.2 % in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 era), followed by a decline to 12.8 % in 2020 and 8.6 % in 2022 (COVID-19 era), p = <0.001). The overall incidence of RR-TB was 3.8 %. The incidence of RR was higher during pre-COVID-19 than the COVID-19 era, 9.5 % vs 2.5 %, p = <0.001. The incidence of RR-TB declined substantially from 28.0 % in 2016 to 1.6 % in 2021 but rose exponentially to 5.4 % in 2022. After controlling for confounders, only the pre-COVID-19 status was associated with increased odds for RR (adjusted odds ratio 3.3, 95 % confidence interval, 2.049, 5.421). Conclusion: This study found a progressive decline in MTB notification since the COVID-19 pandemic's outbreak. Furthermore, RR-TB notification decreased gradually in the pre-COVID-19 era, with a resurgence in 2022. In the era of COVID-19, there is an urgent need to increase intervention efforts in order to halt the decline in MTB detection rates and the resurgence of RR-TB.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in six geopolitical zones in Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey.

Introduction: the high expectations that heralded the development of COVID-19 vaccines has been plagued with vaccine hesitancy (VH). The prevalence and associated factors of COVID-19 VH in the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria are explored. Methods: using a cross sectional survey, a pre-tested and validated questionnaire on a "Google form" was distributed via social media platforms and hard copies in the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria. Included, using a chain-reference sampling technique, were healthcare workers (HCW), university students and adults in the general population. Participants who expressed unwillingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine in the event of an available vaccine were considered to have vaccine hesitancy. Frequency and percentage were used to describe categorical variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess for factors associated with VH. Level of significance was set at 5% on two-sided tails test. Results: among 1615 respondents, mean (standard deviation) age was 36.7 (11.3) years, and 847 (52.4%) were males. More than half were healthcare workers (943; 58.4%), 97.4% had at least secondary level of education, and majority 60.5% belonged to the upper social class. The prevalence of VH was 68.5% (1107/1615), and 67.2% preferred foreign manufactured COVID-19 vaccines. On multivariable regression analysis, residence in Northeast (AOR 6.01, 95% CI 2.24, 16.10) and Northwest (AOR 3.33, 95% CI 1, 48, 7.48) geopolitical zones, the Igbo ethnic group (AOR 1.88, 95% 1.10, 3.22), Christians (AOR 1.86, 95% 1.10, 3.14), nurses (AOR 3.50, 95% CI 1.25, 9.80), pharmacist (AOR 5.82, 95% CI 2.12, 16.32) and participants without confidence in foreign vaccines (AOR 4.13, 95% CI 2.99, 5.72) were at higher likelihood of VH. Conclusion: vaccine hesitancy is high among adults in Nigeria, with higher likelihood among the Igbo ethnic group, Christian faith, residence in Northeast and Northwest geopolitical zones and those with an aversion to foreign-made vaccines. Targeted interventions are required for the desired COVID-19 vaccine uptake rate and herd immunity.